Coalition set up to fight sexual exploitation
 Beechcraft planes pursue Russian market
 Rugby Union: French final
 Debating Russia: The crisis in Syria
 Obese Britain shows sharp diabetes rise
 Automatic call systems cracked

Sports: long wait for sex revolution?

 
Aug 3, 2012 18:26
Print Email Add to blog
Getty Images
Download
Getty Images

Over the course of the London Olympic Games, 4,847 women will have taken part in the Games. Never before will every competing nation have been represented by at least one female athlete. On one hand, inside the Games, equality is closer than ever.

Back in 1900 the first 22 women, out of a total of 997 athletes, took part. As recently as 1984, at the Los Angeles Games, the number of women involved remained less than a quarter. Four years ago in Beijing it was 43% and in London it will be 44%.

Should we be celebrating how far women in sport have come or lamenting the fact that there is still so much further they could go?

Female athletes are still speaking publicly about the pressures faced by women in sport, women’s sports command a fraction of the sponsorship or media attention that men's sports do.

Who should be blame: the media, the sponsors, or perhaps this isn’t a problem at all?

VOR’s Polina Boiko discusses this with Tim Woodhouse, the Head of Policy at the Women’s Sport and Fitness Foundation; Mike Buchanan from the ANTI-FEMINISM LEAGUE; a Professor Mary Evans from the London School of Economics Gender Institute.

 

Related articles

 
YOUR COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS ARE WELCOME
uk@ruvr.ru
(+44) 0207 104 2283


Rambler's Top100